Plant training techniques represent one of the most powerful tools available to cannabis cultivators for optimizing yield, managing canopy structure, and maximizing light utilization. However, the effectiveness of these methods isn’t based on tradition or guesswork—it’s rooted in fundamental plant biology principles that govern how cannabis plants grow, respond to stress, and allocate resources.

Understanding the science behind training techniques allows cultivators to make informed decisions about when, how, and why to apply specific methods. This knowledge transforms training from a collection of techniques into a systematic approach based on plant physiology and environmental optimization.

Apical Dominance and Hormonal Control

The Foundation of Plant Architecture

Apical dominance represents the fundamental organizing principle of cannabis plant structure. This phenomenon occurs when the main growing tip (apical meristem) produces auxin hormones that suppress the growth of lateral branches below it. The result is the characteristic Christmas tree shape of untrained cannabis plants, with a dominant central cola and progressively smaller side branches.

The primary auxin responsible for apical dominance is indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), which is produced in young leaves and growing tips. This hormone moves downward through the plant via the phloem, creating a concentration gradient that determines branch development patterns. Higher auxin concentrations near the apex suppress lateral bud break, while lower concentrations further down the plant allow some side branch development.

Breaking Dominance Through Training

Training techniques work by disrupting this natural auxin flow and redistribution pattern. When the apical meristem is removed (topping) or bent below the horizontal plane (LST), auxin production and transport are altered, triggering the release of lateral buds from dormancy. This process, called bud break or lateral shoot emergence, typically occurs within 3-7 days of training intervention.

The plant’s response to training involves complex interactions between multiple hormone systems. Cytokinins, produced primarily in root tips, promote lateral bud development and work in opposition to auxin. When auxin dominance is reduced through training, cytokinin effects become more pronounced, leading to increased branching and bushier growth patterns.

Low Stress Training (LST) Mechanics

Physics of Bending and Plant Response

Low stress training works by gradually bending branches to create a more horizontal canopy without breaking plant tissue. This technique exploits the plant’s natural gravitropic response—the tendency to grow upward against gravity. When a branch is bent horizontally, the plant perceives this as a loss of apical dominance and responds by redirecting growth hormones.

The bending process creates differential stress patterns within plant tissues. The outer (convex) side of the bend experiences tension stress, while the inner (concave) side experiences compression. Cannabis stems respond to this mechanical stress by producing reaction wood—specialized tissue that helps the plant maintain structural integrity while adapting to the new growth orientation.

Optimal Bending Angles and Timing

Research on woody plants suggests that bending branches to angles between 45-90 degrees from vertical provides optimal results for breaking apical dominance while maintaining adequate nutrient and water transport. Bending beyond 90 degrees (below horizontal) can stress vascular systems and reduce transport efficiency, particularly in younger, less lignified stems.

The timing of LST applications significantly impacts effectiveness. Young, flexible stems (typically 2-4 weeks into vegetative growth) respond best to bending, as their cell walls contain higher moisture content and less lignin. Older, woodier stems become increasingly difficult to bend without damage and may require more gradual training approaches.

High Stress Training Methods

Topping and Fimming: Controlled Damage Response

High stress training methods like topping and fimming work by creating controlled damage that triggers the plant’s natural wound response and apical dominance redistribution. When the main growing tip is removed (topping), auxin production at that site ceases immediately, causing a rapid shift in hormone balance throughout the plant.

The plant’s response to topping involves activating dormant axillary buds through a process called compensatory growth. This response is mediated by changes in auxin-to-cytokinin ratios and involves the upregulation of genes associated with meristem development and cell division. Typically, the two nodes immediately below the cut site become the new dominant growing points, effectively doubling the number of main colas.

Fimming (F*ck I Missed) involves removing approximately 75% of the newest growth tip, leaving some apical tissue intact. This technique creates a less dramatic hormone shift than complete topping, often resulting in 3-4 new growing points rather than the typical 2 from topping. The partial removal allows some continued auxin production while still triggering lateral bud development.

SCROG (Screen of Green) Systems

Screen of Green training combines multiple techniques with physical support structures to create an even canopy of growing tips. The screen serves as both a training tool and a support system, allowing cultivators to weave branches horizontally before allowing vertical growth during flowering.

SCROG systems work by maximizing the number of growing tips at the same canopy level, ensuring even light distribution and optimal photosynthetic efficiency. The horizontal training phase during vegetative growth creates numerous bud sites, while the vertical growth phase during flowering allows these sites to develop into substantial colas.

Defoliation and Leaf Management

Photosynthetic vs. Structural Considerations

Defoliation represents one of the most controversial training techniques, as it involves removing the plant’s primary photosynthetic organs. The practice works on the principle that strategic leaf removal can improve light penetration to lower bud sites and redirect the plant’s energy toward flower production rather than leaf maintenance.

Cannabis plants typically maintain 20-30% excess photosynthetic capacity under optimal conditions, meaning they can lose some leaf area without significantly impacting overall photosynthesis. However, the timing, extent, and method of defoliation critically determine whether the practice enhances or hinders plant performance.

The plant’s response to defoliation involves mobilizing stored carbohydrates and nutrients from remaining leaves and stems to maintain metabolic functions. This process can temporarily stress the plant but may ultimately result in more efficient resource allocation if performed correctly.

Timing and Environmental Considerations

Vegetative vs. Flowering Applications

The effectiveness of training techniques varies significantly between vegetative and flowering phases due to changing hormone profiles and growth patterns. During vegetative growth, high auxin and cytokinin activity make plants highly responsive to training interventions. The plant’s primary focus on structural development during this phase allows for dramatic architectural changes with minimal stress.

Flowering phase training requires more careful consideration, as the plant’s energy allocation shifts toward reproductive development. Heavy training during early flowering can delay bud development and reduce final yields. However, light training and maintenance techniques can still be beneficial for optimizing light distribution and airflow.

Environmental Stress Interactions

Training techniques create temporary stress that can compound with environmental stressors like temperature extremes, nutrient deficiencies, or water stress. Plants recovering from training interventions have increased metabolic demands and may be more susceptible to additional stressors for 3-7 days following treatment.

Optimal environmental conditions during training recovery include stable temperatures (70-75°F), moderate humidity (50-60% RH), adequate but not excessive lighting, and consistent nutrient availability. These conditions support rapid tissue repair and minimize recovery time.

Integration with Breeding Programs

Phenotype Expression and Training Response

Different cannabis phenotypes exhibit varying responses to training techniques based on their genetic background and growth characteristics. Indica-dominant varieties typically respond well to training due to their naturally bushy growth patterns and flexible stems. Sativa-dominant varieties may require more careful training approaches due to their tendency toward tall, stretchy growth and more brittle stem structure.

Training response can serve as a valuable selection criterion in breeding programs. Plants that recover quickly from training stress, maintain vigorous growth, and produce well-distributed canopies may possess desirable traits for commercial cultivation. These characteristics often correlate with overall plant vigor and stress tolerance.

Breeding for Training Compatibility

Modern breeding programs increasingly consider training compatibility as a selection criterion. Traits like stem flexibility, internode spacing, branching tendency, and stress recovery rate all influence how well a variety responds to training techniques. Selecting for these characteristics can produce cultivars specifically suited to intensive training systems.

Resources

1. Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I. M., & Murphy, A. (2015). Plant Physiology and Development (6th ed.). Sinauer Associates. ISBN: 978-1605353531

2. Went, F. W. (1937). Auxin, the plant growth-hormone. The Botanical Review, 3(3), 162-182. DOI: 10.1007/BF02872484

3. Cline, M. G. (1997). Concepts and terminology of apical dominance. American Journal of Botany, 84(9), 1064-1069. DOI: 10.2307/2446149

4. Leyser, O. (2003). Regulation of shoot branching by auxin. Trends in Plant Science, 8(11), 541-545. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.09.008

5. Rosenthal, E. (2010). Marijuana Grower’s Handbook. Quick American Publishing. ISBN: 978-0932551467

6. Cervantes, J. (2006). Marijuana Horticulture: The Indoor/Outdoor Medical Grower’s Bible. Van Patten Publishing. ISBN: 978-1878823236

7. Wilson, B. F. (2000). Apical control of branch growth and angle in woody plants. American Journal of Botany, 87(5), 601-607. DOI: 10.2307/2656846

8. Prusinkiewicz, P., Crawford, S., Smith, R. S., Ljung, K., Bennett, T., Ongaro, V., & Leyser, O. (2009). Control of bud activation by an auxin transport switch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(41), 17431-17436. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906696106

If you found this post interesting, consider hitting the “Buy me fertilizer” button below to chuck a few dollars in the pot. Your support helps this educational resource keep growing!

[This post assumes legal hemp/cannabis breeding in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.]